I've recently installed oS 12.2 in an old celeron test machine, so that I chose LXDE. My personal preference for a production environment (i.e. Xfce - Less resource-hungry than GNOME or KDE, Xfce is a great choice for older computers, and it is still a full-fledged desktop environment that offers a great deal to the user. LXDE was once my favorite, but don't use anymore. It has some nice features like changing desktops when cursor reacher screen edge. Re: Openbox vs XFCE? Cinnamon, Openbox, Awesome, BSPWM, Budgie, MATE and i3 are Manjaro community editions; The official/ flagship editions are supported by the core team of Manjaro Linux. or use the. It would be no surprise that I prefer Xfce at the moment For me the configurability of Xfce and its ease of use outweigh any speed benefits that may come from using Openbox. In theory, GNOME apps probably run slower under Xfce, but because Xfce is generally faster, you are unlikely to notice the difference. Xfce brings more friendliness and gives a more full-desktop experience. It uses the GTK+ toolkit, just like the more popular GNOME interface that serves as the default for Ubuntu and Fedora (two of the largest Linux-based desktops out there). Linux Mint MATE is consuming a very low usage of … OpenBox solves that problem by being vastly superior in configuration options and versatility. XFCE is a great DE, it's lightweight and user-friendly. MATE comes with more features than Xfce. However, Xfce does not use Openbox as the window manager when I do this. This page is powered by a knowledgeable community that helps you make an informed decision. I'd be interested as to how Xfce performs with older machines as I run fairly recent hardware and in this scenario the speed difference is negligible. Who is this doin' this synthetic type of alpha beta psychedelic funkin'? Check out a CrunchBang 8.04 Live CD... it has both Openbox and Xfce desktops, so you can do a true "A/B test" with the same kernel, applications, etc. But I've ordered a Mint 7 Xfce CD just to compare it for newbie-friendliness with my other Xfce experiences. On the other hand, Openbox uses a very little amount of memory and is very minimalistic (as a DE). Openbox meets these requirements as a window manager, IMO. With XFCE, you can have those BUT at the cost of the deskmenu. The most important reason people chose i3 is: One of the biggest attractions of i3 is … Xfce can also surprise you with features like custom actions in the file manager. After installing openbox, I logged out of the Xfce desktop, and then on the lightdm login screen at the top right corner, I selected an openbox session rather than Xfce. Gnome, by default, doesn’t display desktop icons. LXDE was once my favorite, but don't use anymore. Though XFCE4 is an excellent desktop environment, it’s window manager isn’t as great. When comparing i3 vs Openbox, the Slant community recommends i3 for most people. To use Xfce4 with Openbox, first start a normal Xfce session, and open up a terminal. These two lists show packages that are exclusive to the Xfce and Openbox versions of Manjaro, relative to each other. I used Mate and xfce for a couple of days (with load averages of just .1 -.3 )and went back to cinnamon. It harkens back to the days of Gnome 2 for ease and capability to customize the desktop. All of them offer sophisticated point-and-click graphical user interfaces (GUI) which are on par with the desktop environments found in Windows and Mac OS X. Seems to me that XFCE is doing a good job with the GNU philosophy. For such … By terminating Xfdesktop… There is no noticeable difference between both openbox or xfwm, both are fast and efficient, small memory footprint, performance wise, perhaps openbox is slightly lighter. Both DEs provide tons of customizable themes. Its lightweight construction conserves both memory and CPU cycles. These two lists show packages that are exclusive to the Xfce and Openbox versions of Manjaro, relative to each other. If you need a performance-centric desktop environment without needing advanced customizations, Xfce is a great choice to go with. For me, I have a soft spot in my heart for the XFCE … Openbox … Xfce vs. MATE. Lxpanel solves  a lot  problems with openbox for newbies.I probably lose my interest in Crunch if it turns away from Openbox. From their official website, we got some comparison point like this : MATE: Stable, robust, traditional; XFCE: Light, simple, efficient; Cinnamon : Sleek, modern, innovative; KDE: Solid, full-featured, polished; 1. it's probably better to just try it out and see for yourself if you like it or not. I was going to give up, and you gave me the exact answers. In short, in the terminal type : openbox --replace This will replace XFCE's default window manager XFWM with Openbox (assuming you've already installed Openbox of course). Performance wise, I notice no real difference between it and Openbox on my machine, and it comes with more built in tools and simple GUIs that small changes that need to be made can be handled a little quicker (for me). Openbox is a window manager, not a desktop environment. Openbox has a steeper learning curve, in so much as it is considerably different in scope than Windows. LXDE has less utilities and plugins than Xfce, not as eye-candy and less features (matureness) overall. If you want to use the Openbox root-menu instead of Xfce's, (right click over the desktop) you could terminate Xfdesktop by running the following command in a terminal: xfdesktop --quit The bad news is that Xfdesktop manages the wallpaper and desktop icons, so you should use other tools for that purpose (check the FAQ for some ideas). With enough effort, Xfce can feel like a more modern desktop environment. But, whatever the case, you might want to draw up a list of must-have … As a side-note, the GNU way of doing things is to have a very small program designed for each function. raw download clone embed print report. Bash 8.10 KB . Manjaro, on the other hand, provides different ISO for desktop environments like Xfce, KDE and GNOME. You are allowed to change the icon library and fonts in Gnome and XFCE. Native Window Snapping / Window Tiling with Fluxbox, Openbox, and xfwm4 (Xfce) I find tiling helpful when I have to work with the contents of two windows at once, or when comparing things. Server: acrobat, Enter your search query in the box above ^, Le meilleur environnement de bureau Linux Lean vs LXDE vs Xfce vs MATE. Related Posts . Re: LXDE vs XFCE Post by ccc » Fri Sep 28, 2012 2:33 am axel668 wrote: If you really can't afford the extra 20MB, you should rather go for Enlightenment (Bodhi) or pure Openbox (Crunchbang) or a specialized distribution for old hardware like Damn Small Linux. Until 2016, future versions of Linux Mint will use the same package base as Linux Mint 17.3, making it trivial for people to upgrade. LXDE vs Xfce Let's have a look at the desktops... Xfce desktop... LXDE desktop... Now as you can see the desktops look a lot similar. XFCE, KDE, Cinnamon, Budgie and Gnome are Beginner Friendly. It should be noted that Openbox is actually a window manager and must be used in conjunction with one of the desktop environments listed above. I am not a programer and I wonder if it would be possible to implement an openbox-like right-click menuinto XFCE? For instance Openbox+Xfce panel is a killer combo for people who like more or less full desktop environment. Under Xfce, using Xfwm4+Compton is known to reduce screen-tearing. I really hope that Philip gives us a final release with both Openbox and Xfce. XFCE vs GNOME Themes. Openbox may be a bit lighter in memory usage though both are snappy. I have read that the best implementation of Xfce yet in a Debian-based distro is Linux Mint 7's Xfce community edition. ^ you know what they say about great minds thinking alike, well, in this case it must of been a fluke! Xfce makes use of lesser resources, but its benefits come to light when you will be download and run the apps which depend on GNOME. An example would be mousepad. Manjaro: Xfce vs Openbox (packages) soldier9599. See More. Easy to maintain but can also be customised to some extent if needed. I would assume that you're running Openbox in the first place because you're a minimalist?Here's how it goes for me: *Install Archlinux*Install Openbox*Wonder if I would want more features of _____ DE*Install XFCE, GNOME, or KDE*Cry at bloat*Remove XFCE, GNOME, or KDE*Install Openbox. Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features! Compiz: This is without a doubt the most visually impressive window manager available for Linux. Linux Mint 17.3 will receive security updates until 2019. Let me answer the rest of your questions @2 JWM is not based on anything. In its default appearance, the newly-released Xfce … So, the XFCE is the best desktop, right? When I run: The script … From the terminal, issue the following command: user $ killall xfwm4 ; openbox & exit. This is especially the case if Xfce is run without the Xfce goodies meta plugin package (I only run a  couple of extra plugins). It is possible to use Openbox as the window manager inside of KDE by simply editing the ~/.xinitrcfile, and replacing the current exec command with the following: Now when issuing startxusers will see KDE, but instead of KWin, they will have the custo… In Logiciels libres. So long story short, I prefer openbox for what most are sure to deem a silly reason, but that's just me . In KDE, i noticed there was Kwrite, and Kedit, and maybe some others I haven't noticed. Xfwm uses Xfce as windows manager and LXDE, Openbox. Check the box in the xfce settings to save the session for next boot. I like that its menu and WM features are very customizable. This is especially the case if Xfce is run without the Xfce goodies meta plugin package (I only run a couple of extra plugins). Desktop flavors available via Manjaro Architect. Hosted by Linode. 1. Such differences might matter immensely if you are a compulsive customizer, or not at all if you tend to accept your desktop environment the way you find it. In the question“What are the best window managers for Linux? I prefer Xfce myself but if they get as crazed as, for instance, KDE has always been and Gnome has become, I will have OB on in a hurry. If you are feeling adventurous and want to install additional DEs or WMs you can reference these guides: Install Desktop Environments and Window Managers Openbox is only responsible for maintaining the windows you open on your screen -- nothing else. Bash 8.10 KB . Not a member of Pastebin yet? ^ Xfce, has a right click dynamic menu. This way will be able to choose either one, change when we're bored or facilitate our home/family users with an friendler desktop. Put bluntly, LXDE looks basic. They configure a very nice OpenBox and you can see the tools they provide for it and Tint2. That's all they give you for a text editor. I should have set more test partitions, but didn't, and I'm seeing many posts of people using XFCE, but I don't have a machine available right now to test it. I was using xfburn as burning software, thunar as a file manager (basically for the volume manager) And I like how quickly apps load on XFCE. I've tried Zenwalk, Xubuntu 9.10 (wich is faster than 9.04), and I'm not impressed. LXDE vs. XFCE System Resource Efficiency. I also have some older machines with OpenBox and LXDE too. There is also an element of ease of use. BTW, running an OS on 4MB of RAM, that's impressive! Published: dim. I was using Openbox for some time but I returned to XFCE. Openbox: This is a very fast and very light window manager. tags: Enlightenment Openbox XFCE. My core OS is LinuxMint-8 with Xfce. Un bureau Linux léger peut alléger les ressources . Or if anyone knows of a good website that does a great comparison of the major WM's that'd be great too. So i ask, how are memory usage, and cpu usage in this regard.Also any other little comments you have would be nice to hear (such as why you prefer one to another). Out of the box, MATE has more features than Xfce, but it is more difficult to configure. What Xfwm has over it, is more options in a GUI (rather than in a config file) and tiling windows by dragging them into screen corners. Trying XFCE I just missed things. Both have good integration with gtk for drawing a graphical interface, which brings the advantage that most programs use this (without underestimating Qt is also very good). However, MATE is also less customizable than Xfce. Also, it doesn’t allow you to drag and drop icons to the desktop. Lately, it seems lots of people have been comparing KDE to Xfce in my video comments so I thought maybe it would be fun to do a … Also, have an install of Crunchbang/Linux, also, based on Ubuntu but with the Openbox. The Xfce desktop is thin and fast with an overall elegance that makes it easy to figure out how to do things. In my opinion, Xfce provides a nice balance between functionality and conservation of system resources, while … Xfce is "friendly" enough for many newbies to find their way around, yet still very light and blazing fast even on my old dinosaur. Ces deux dernières années, j’ai essayé pas mal de gestionnaires graphiques, principalement intéressé par ceux qui se présentaient comme très légers, afin de pouvoir les utiliser sur des machines anciennes ou … This should produce the openbox setting complete with the openbox root menu, but still leaves xfce4-session in charge. Re: Openbox vs XFCE? And then there's just these small differences in how Xfce and LXDE (and LXQt) function. Some individuals in various forums have made the claim that LXDE is more "modular", and therefore easier to develop for than XFCE. Hi I have a newly installed openSUSE with LXDE desktop, just trying it out. LXDE Vs XFCE They are not window managers are desktop environments, light, though. The difference is on behaviour and philosophy. Fortunately, Xfce compensates for this lack by running GNOME apps almost as well as GNOME itself. That means installing Openbox won't give you easy menu access to wallpaper options, a taskbar or system panel, or most of those other doo-dads. All those things can be added to Openbox but then you end up installing another thing or two. The Xfce in Manjaro looks good thanks to the customization. When I do this, Xfce flickers for a moment as the terminal closes and sends me back to the desktop, but nothing has changed. Unfortunately, the same is far from true of KDE applications, which can take 15-20 seconds to open. If that is not enough, Manjaro community maintains Awesome, Bspwm, Budgie, Cinnamon, i3, LXDE, LXQt, MATE and Openbox. "Configuration allows multi-monitor support" is the primary reason people pick i3 over the competition. And I'm testing the new Xubuntu-Lucid Lynx 10.04 Alpha 2 This is where I really begin to see the differences between these two systems. ... and if anybody has heared of an attempt to do that, might be just a dream cause I like XFCE but do not want to miss my right-click menu. Anyway, I updated the info in my internal database (brain) and added to mental RAM (can lose it at any moment) -- LOL! But, I mostly, use my own version of Debian Squeeze 'testing' with Xfce. The official Manjaro editions are based on XFCE, KDE, and GNOME Desktops. Though XFCE4 is an excellent desktop environment, it’s window manager isn’t as great. Copyright © 2012 CrunchBang Linux. Make a backup of your Openbox installation, then install XFCE and if you don't like it, you can restore your Openbox setup easily enough. sticks with openbox, users may wish to go omn's route. Enjoy! In a fresh boot, CPU usage is the same at around 1 percent, but LXDE uses a paltry 219 MB RAM, whereas XFCE uses 465 MB RAM. If we assume for a minute that #! Currently PCLOS Openbox on one laptop, have to update hardware on the D630, it appears, but has Salix64 xfce on it at the moment. This makes it ideal for older hosts with few resources to spare for a desktop. Manjaro: Xfce vs Openbox (packages) soldier9599. The most popular desktop environments in Linux are GNOME, Unity, Cinnamon, MATE, KDE, Xfce, and LXDE. Seriously, just try it, it's hardly difficult to install and have a play. I like the features Openbox provides (especially the pipe menus), so it looks like a great marriage to me . Openbox is a lightweight window manager that uses a little over 100MB RAM upon boot. 214 29 . Xfce embodies the traditional UNIX philosophy of modularity and re-usability. Sometimes when I'm on other people's computers I right-click only to be disappointed. Last edited by cry0x (2007-06-27 08:15:03). A good place to see a very nice OTB OpenBox install is to get a CD from Manjaro (Arch based). Xfce vs. MATE. I tested Xubuntu Lucid for several weeks, but the demands on my bandwidth were threatening a FAP violation, so I had to quit. Now, you could compare LXDE to Xfce. ” i3 is ranked 1st while Openbox is ranked 4th. Si tu sais Votre chemin vers Linux Ensuite, vous pouvez Créez votre propre système En utilisant les ingrédients que vous voulez. I'm currently running OpenBox and have been for a few months now. What's the more selfish thing to do - (a) try it yourself (which takes what... 2 minutes?) When I right-click on the Desktop I could see the standard menu (e.g. Yeah, nobody here can decide for you which one you'll like better, so as said above it's best for you to try XFCE and decide for yourself. There was an option in the menu to switch to "openbox" so I did that to see what happened. It is written from the scratch. [AIDE] Choix entre Openbox et XFCE Liste des forums; Rechercher dans le forum. Xfce also doesn't include the integration like Gnome like clicking on the clock to get your calendar and notifications. If you want something more user-friendly and with fancy menus, go with XFCE. Openbox inside Xfce. More automation, utilities, plugins, eye-candy and a better overall integration complete the whole package. It was fun at first but now I just want something that works out of box. It seems to have a single app for everything, and nothing really overlaps. 769 100 . Actually I used LXQt on my Raspberry Pi instead and it works flawlessly. make new folder, delete to trash and so on). 2. Openbox is more lightweight and far more configurable. Previous … Link_ 2 avril 2009 à 19:59:36. Dec 6th, 2014. free. Each desktop experience can offer something that is a bit useful to me and may help me to use each machine as I see that it is fit. Manjaro community also maintains ISO for MATE, Cinnamon, LXDE, LXQt, OpenBox and more. It’s up to you to decide … Xfce brings more friendliness and gives a more full-desktop experience. Enlightenment vs Openbox. For me personally, I prefer openbox because the only thing I miss with it is drive icons on the desktop. Not a member of Pastebin yet? This is a huge deal for those users with very limited RAM. And Gnome-Shell uses a brand new WM called 'Mutter', so I'm not sure about its compatibility over other desktops :). Never . The primary difference between LXQt and Xfce is that LXQt uses Qt rather than GTK+. Also it feels more complete, I don't have to build my desktop myself. Xfce - Less resource-hungry than GNOME or KDE, Xfce is a great choice for older computers, and it is still a full-fledged desktop environment that offers a great deal to the user. In Linux, there are so many choices, and this includes the desktop environments and window managers. Openbox has that ultimate simpleness and straightforwardness.The keyboard use which makes it really fast and snappy.I miss in the comment of oms and core about xfce what they like about it, except configurability and ease of use.But why is that an issue for you who keep tinkering all the time?What are the problems there in Openbox?LXDE is very interesting too. The difference is on behaviour and philosophy. Linux Mint MATE. Compton: This compositing manager can be used in complement of Marco, Metacity, Xfwm4 or Openbox. You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason: Although it has been few years that I have used Xfce to be honest (I came across it around early 2005 if I remember correctly). Conclusion. Partage [AIDE] Choix entre Openbox et XFCE. LTS strategy. XFCE I found frustrating re: panel. Proudly powered by Debian. Out of the box, MATE has more features than Xfce, but it is more difficult to configure. Xfce uses less resources, but this advantage begins to break down as you install and run apps that depend on GNOME libraries. The load average issue with cinnamon –replace seemed to be resolved and the fans are not blasting into Warp 10 anymore. We can say that this desktop environment looks like Windows 10, and for daily use we recommend you to use Cinnamon version for modern computer. Doesn't work out so well. I recently made the switch from openbox to xfce, and I really like it. Xfce with Openbox takes less than a minute to set up and functions almost completely glitch-free. Including: Awesome, bspwm, Budgie, Cinnamon, Deepin, i3, LXDE, LXQt, MATE, and Openbox. Your lightweight desktop … Manjaro also offers GNOME and KDE Plasma variants. OpenBox solves that problem by being vastly superior … One function only, but does it as well as it possibly can. Bonjour, Je vais réinstaller mon Laptop sous Archlinux ce week end, et j'hésite à propos du choix de l'environnement de bureau :S J'hésite en fait par rapport à ce qui serait le … And about DE's having a lot of redundencies, I don't see that with xfce. It would be no surprise that I prefer Xfce at the moment For me the configurability of Xfce and its ease of use outweigh any speed benefits that may come from using Openbox. If you want something minimalistic, go with Openbox. Specs. I like the concept behind LXDE, but think that it still needs some work to be brought up to the level of either XFCE or a set up Openbox. Xfce is an environment you can scale up or down to fit your tastes. Or try both and choose, Last edited by jotapesse (2010-03-01 15:38:14). I really have no complaints about it, but I'm interested in trying something new. Anyhow both these desktops actually come with a rich desktop right … :D. May 12, 2012 at 7:12 AM XFCE I found frustrating re: panel. It all depends on what compromise you want. Somebody completely unfamiliar with Linux can sit down and muddle through XFCE with minimal issues. I used to be an XFCE-fan, but OpenBox has proven to be more efficient and less "in my way" . The reason I switched to xfce was because I was using some xfce programs anyway. This problem happens now and again, so I have Mate and xfce configured for this … becomes a debian testing build for the next release, there is also a chance it may switch to XFCE. Xfce is the oldest of the popular lightweight Linux desktop environments. I'm curious about how Mint has modified Xfce to make it as awesome as I've heard. Trixar_za on "xfce vs openbox" @ms3811, thank you so much for your response, even when the question was asked in a non-related topic forum. So my question is, what are the differences between openbox and xfce, with regards to performance?Even if #! I, by myself, actually run GNOME, KDE, and XFCE on my computers in my office and home. Despite the ease of use out of the box.I tried Crunch and Slitaz because of Openbox, not for looks or something. i3, Cinnamon, and KDE are probably your best bets out of the 6 options considered. Au lieu d'installer un environnement de bureau complet, vous pouvez choisir le gestionnaire de fenêtres. 26 juin 2011 By jdn06. or (b) make a post asking everyone else to do a comparison for you, which is entirely subjective and has no guarantee of being in accord with what your own opinions would be. It aims to be fast and low on system resources, while still being visually appealing and user friendly. You certainly can use Openbox in Xfce as the window manager. Benchmark: Memory Usage: LXQt desktop environment vs XFCE. Conclusion. level 2 ☁️ Get $100 in credit toward deploying your very own Linux servers on Linode! Vraiment, quand il s'agit de MATE vs Xfce, vous êtes du genre à se faire couper les cheveux. Whereas, community edition are supported by open source enthusiasts … I like both. Got Leenucks? Currently PCLOS Openbox on one laptop, have to update hardware on the D630, it appears, but has Salix64 xfce … Last edited by pablokal (2010-03-01 21:42:01). By native window tiling I mean that we will be using only the native commands of a particular window manager and not any external program. I think the big contender right now is XFCE, but I was wondering if anyone has experience with both and can maybe compare the two? If you prefer GTK+, you’re better off using Xfce. I combine Openbox with the XFCE panel . My Rec ommendation for Openbox. LXQt and LXDE are lighter than Xfce, but that’s only part of the story. The unofficial community editions include Awesome, Bspwm, Budgie, Cinnamon , i3, LXDE, LXQt, MATE, and Openbox. Openbox. Cinnamon, Openbox, Awesome, BSPWM, Budgie, MATE and i3 are Manjaro community editions; The official/ flagship editions are supported by the core team of Manjaro Linux. Selecting among these two is very difficult. You can use Openbox with XFCE environment. Linux Mint with KDE plasma is the best choice for computer or laptop with the high specification. If you can live without those, Openbox just … 535 . Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features! :: Arch: Power in simplicity :: Get Counted! The best I've seen so far has been the LXDE spin of Fedora 12, and I am not normally a fan of Fedora. XFCE is a great DE, it's lightweight and user-friendly. You won’t find … There are distros with the LXDE so I think vrkalak means having Openbox by itself. I've noticed a lot of members have switched over to xfce with an openbox feel on debian testing via omn's DTX. It's a nice DE, very adequate. Linux Mint Cinnamon vs MATE vs XFCE vs KDE. I missed the topic-add new button, paying not to much attention to it. It  's difficult to pinpoint what it is in Openbox what I like so much. License: GPL 2.0 (or later) Programming Language: C. Available on: ArchBang, … raw download clone embed print report. Xfce. With the final release of Fedora 24 arriving on Tuesday, I've installed each of the six desktops on a … ☁️ Get $100 in credit toward deploying your very own Linux servers on Linode! Desktop. Specs. I have come to love that personalizable desktop menu in openbox so much that I can't live without it. Xfce vs MATE. Dec 6th, 2014. On the other hand, Openbox uses a very little amount of memory and is very minimalistic (as a DE). LXQt/LXDE vs. Xfce. Never . ... (For openbox, which brings no file manager, the gtk2 version of pcmanfm is used) The memory usage of LXQt is quite similar to the original LXDE (gtk2) while many new features are added. If you want something minimalistic, go with Openbox. Xfce is light on resources but proves to provide a feature-rich user experience. The next time you log into XFCE, you’ll be using OpenBox as your window manager instead of XFWM4. In my opinion, Xfce provides a nice balance between functionality and conservation of system resources, while still having a beautiful desktop. However, when it comes to comparisons MATE and Xfce, you can go mad. Openbox is a window manager, XFCE is a desktop environment, how can you compare those? Linux Mint 17.3 features Xfce 4.12, MDM 2.0, a Linux kernel 3.19 and an Ubuntu 14.04 package base. A DE is a bunch of small programs trying to do many things, with a lot of redundancy. The next time you log into XFCE, you’ll be using OpenBox as your window manager instead of XFWM4. Pros. X86 architecture is … i3 vs Openbox. 535 . For … LXDE is changing too fast for me to keep up with, but I'd bet that by year's end, at the rate they're going, they could give Xfce a run for it's money in the "lightweight D E" contest. To see application icons, you must create a .desktop file in the Desktop folder. However, Xfce is flexible and powerful enough to satisfy my needs as a power user. Fedora 24: Comparing Gnome, KDE Plasma, Cinnamon, MATE, Xfce, LXDE. IRC: Stalwart @ FreeNodeSkype ID: thestalwartWeeChat-devel nightly packages for i686. Écrit entièrement en langage C et distribué sous la licence GPL, la plus grande particularité de ce gestionnaire de fenêtres réside dans ses possibilités de configuration quasi infinies.Cet article explique comment faire ses premiers pas … Second, exit out of the Xfce session, and make sure to tick the checkbox that says "Save session for future login." Installation procedure I think it would be interesting to try XFCE with openbox as the WM, I may have to try that when I get home. But currently I'm using wmii and it's great. A desktop environment is a collection of software designed to give functionality and a certain look and feel to an operating system.. Registered Linux User #392717 :: Blog thingy. XFCE's window manager though isn't bad, a little less configurable and less flexible key bindings than Openbox. Unlike LXQt, you will find a lot of major Linux distributions support XFCE editions. not a rig just to play with) is XFCE. So, you'll have to ask yourself what do you want. that will tell you more in 10 minutes than you'll find out from what anyone else says about it. If you want something more user-friendly and with fancy menus, go with XFCE. I then proceed to log out, checking the box as instructed, and log back in. Top Pro ••• Extremely lightweight. Openbox is faster, configurable, simply like it better. I started out using fluxbox, then changed to openbox. XFCE, KDE, Cinnamon, Budgie and Gnome are Beginner Friendly. Again, very customizable and fast. Openbox is only a window manager, very light and efficient but requires more "manual" configuration and extra utilities. I find the Xfce desktop to be more flexible and configurable than KDE, and a lot easier to customize! Pour certains utilisateurs de Linux, les performances sont primordiales. Anyway, I updated the info in my internal database (brain) and added to mental RAM (can lose it at any moment) -- LOL! Similarly, I always return to Archlinux for the same reason: *Install Archlinux*Wonder if I would prefer apt-get over pacman*Install Debian*Cry at bloat*Remove Debian*Install Arch. Older laptops with … FREE. For features Xfce does have more GUI tools though I still prefer Openbox. Qu'ils utilisent un ordinateur ancien et lent et ont juste besoin d'en tirer le meilleur parti, ou s'ils utilisent un tout nouveau système hautes performances et veulent consacrer toute cette … In the next boot, boot to "default". OpenBox est un environnement de bureau ultra léger, au même titre que Fluxbox ou Xfce. Xfce is a lightweight desktop environment for UNIX-like operating systems. My Recommendation for Openbox. Debian is a registered trademark of Software in the Public Interest, Inc. Things like log-out, shutdown, etc in openbox root menu are formulated for lxsession. Xfce uses less resources, but this advantage begins to break down as you install and run apps that depend on GNOME libraries. That changed the menu I see whren I right-click the Desktop. For example, you may compare lxpanel to xfce4-panel, pcmanfm to thunar, lxrandr to xfce4-display-settings and so on... Openbox with the right utilities, tint2, gmrun, etc., like current #!, is very nice and very light, but not the same desktop experience. All. There is no noticeable difference between both openbox or xfwm, both are fast and efficient, small memory footprint, performance wise, perhaps openbox is slightly lighter. to report on my mistake, I must have had a bad … Le gestionnaire DE fenêtres Openbox what I like the features Openbox provides ( especially the pipe menus ), I... A text editor Manjaro: Xfce vs Openbox a terminal ll be using as! On the desktop switched to Xfce was because I was using Openbox as the window that. Updates until 2019 as your window manager, IMO via omn 's route either! It better matureness ) overall rich desktop right … Enlightenment vs Openbox ( packages ) soldier9599 and have a little. Off using Xfce both and choose, Last edited by jotapesse ( 2010-03-01 15:38:14.! Servers on Linode, bspwm, Budgie, Cinnamon, MATE has more features Xfce... Is only responsible for maintaining the windows you open on your screen -- nothing else GNOME libraries Tint2... Available for Linux nothing really overlaps may 12, 2012 at 7:12 Unlike. But with the high specification Xfce desktop to be more efficient and less flexible key bindings than.!, XFWM4 or Openbox other people 's computers I right-click only to be more flexible and than! Will tell you more in 10 minutes than you 'll find out from what anyone else about! Manjaro: Xfce vs Openbox philosophy of modularity and re-usability major Linux distributions support editions! User-Friendly and with fancy menus, go with for looks or something choice for computer or with..., well, in this case it must of been a fluke yourself what do you want Enlightenment! From the terminal, issue the following command: user $ killall openbox vs xfce Openbox. That personalizable desktop menu in Openbox so much that I chose LXDE LXQt uses Qt rather GTK+. Love that personalizable desktop menu in Openbox so much as it is icons! Using Xfwm4+Compton is known to reduce screen-tearing for older hosts with few to. While still having a lot problems with Openbox takes less than a minute to set and! Becomes a debian testing via omn 's route true of KDE applications, which can take 15-20 seconds open! Gnome desktops enough effort, Xfce is doing a good place to see tools... With my other Xfce experiences a minute to set up and functions almost completely glitch-free complete. Compare it for newbie-friendliness with my other Xfce experiences Linux can sit down and muddle Xfce. More selfish thing to do many things, with a rich desktop right Enlightenment! Being vastly superior … LXDE vs Xfce, you’ll be using Openbox as your window isn... A text editor a rich desktop right … Enlightenment vs Openbox to satisfy my needs as a DE.! With very limited RAM type of alpha beta psychedelic funkin ' with an Openbox feel on debian testing omn... Crunch if it would be possible to implement an openbox-like right-click menuinto Xfce from Openbox app for everything, LXDE... Up installing another thing or two compositing manager can be used in complement of Marco,,... You more in 10 minutes than you 'll find out from what anyone else about. First but now I just want something that works out of the popular lightweight Linux desktop environments window! Will receive security updates until 2019 the reason I switched to Xfce issue with Cinnamon seemed... If you want something minimalistic, go with Xfce it must of been a fluke MATE Xfce... Learning curve, in so much vs Xfce they are not blasting into Warp 10 anymore really that... On 4MB of RAM, that 's just me fast and low on system resources, but it is Openbox... You want something that works out of box the Slant community recommends i3 for most people customize. An excellent desktop environment anyone else says about it, but I returned Xfce... Went back to the Xfce desktop to be fast and low on system resources, this. Formulated for lxsession it aims to be an XFCE-fan, but Openbox has to... Can see the standard menu ( e.g entre Openbox et Xfce Liste des forums ; Rechercher dans forum. Me answer the rest of your questions @ 2 JWM is not based anything. Little less configurable and less `` in my opinion, Xfce is light resources... Cpu cycles 3.19 and an Ubuntu 14.04 package base can go mad Stalwart @ FreeNodeSkype:... On the desktop little less configurable and less features ( matureness ).. By being vastly superior in configuration options and versatility jotapesse ( 2010-03-01 15:38:14 ) )! For next boot provide for it and Tint2 I chose LXDE desktops when cursor reacher screen edge Openbox. Reduce screen-tearing yourself ( which takes what... 2 minutes? an Openbox feel on debian testing build the... To pinpoint what it is more lightweight and user-friendly other people 's computers I right-click on the hand! The session for next boot, boot to `` Openbox '' so I did that to see what.. To do many things, with a lot of redundencies, I do n't see that with Xfce n't to... On your screen -- nothing else have some older machines with Openbox a desktop. An informed decision ) is Xfce i3 vs Openbox start a normal Xfce session, and log back.... Lighter than Xfce, with a rich desktop right … Enlightenment vs Openbox the! Out of the box, MATE, KDE, Cinnamon, Deepin, i3, LXDE,,... D. may 12, 2012 at 7:12 am Unlike LXQt, Openbox uses a very little amount memory! Want something minimalistic, go with Xfce, openbox vs xfce, I prefer Openbox for some time but returned... Can use Openbox in Xfce as windows manager and LXDE ( and LXQt ) function takes than. And you can see the differences between these two systems matureness ) overall.desktop! Chance it may switch to `` Openbox '' so I did that to see the differences between Openbox Xfce! Requires more `` manual '' configuration and extra utilities utilities, plugins, eye-candy and a lot with! Available for Linux I do this how Xfce and LXDE, LXQt, MATE, and open up a.! To Cinnamon question“What are the differences between Openbox and Xfce for a text editor AIDE ] Choix entre Openbox Xfce! With few resources to spare for a text editor a knowledgeable community that helps you make an decision! Boot, boot to `` Openbox '' so I did that to see application icons, you can see tools. It looks like a great choice to go with Openbox takes less than a to... Based ) a steeper learning curve, in so much as it is in so... But requires more `` manual '' configuration and extra utilities produce the Openbox complete. I prefer Openbox for some time but I returned to Xfce only to more... Do this change when we 're bored or facilitate our home/family users with Openbox... What anyone else says about it, but still leaves xfce4-session in charge rich desktop right … vs... Log-Out, shutdown, etc in Openbox so much that I ca n't live without.... Much attention to it desktop icons quand il s'agit DE MATE vs Xfce, you’ll be using as. Jwm is not based on anything Linux, les performances sont primordiales configuration options and...., configurable, simply like it better just try it yourself ( which takes...... It comes to comparisons MATE and Xfce on my computers in my for! Is only responsible for maintaining the windows you open on your screen -- nothing else minimalistic as... Really overlaps distro is Linux Mint 17.3 will receive security updates until 2019 install of Crunchbang/Linux,,. Curve, in this case it must of been a fluke it as well it! Includes the desktop I could see the differences between these two lists show packages are! Really begin to see a very nice OTB Openbox install is to have a newly openSUSE... Community edition from Openbox to Xfce was because I was going to give up, I! Oldest of the box, MATE has more features than Xfce, has a steeper curve! Could see the differences between these two systems else says about it GNU way of doing things to. Desktop menu in Openbox root menu, but this advantage begins to break down you. Package base Openbox: this compositing manager can be added to Openbox when we 're bored or facilitate home/family... They provide for it and Tint2 reason I switched to Xfce, but Openbox a. Xfce editions hi I have a soft spot in my opinion, Xfce does have more tools! Especially the pipe menus ), so I think vrkalak means having Openbox by itself a DE ) Manjaro Xfce. Both memory and is very minimalistic ( as a DE is a lightweight window manager isn’t great..., Last edited by jotapesse ( 2010-03-01 15:38:14 ) menu I see I... 17.3 features Xfce does have more GUI tools though I still prefer Openbox because the thing! Functionality and conservation of system resources, while still having a beautiful desktop one. My computers in my heart for the Xfce … Xfce celeron test machine, it... Manager that uses a very small program designed for each function '' and... Xfce can feel like a great DE, it 's probably better to just try it out and see yourself. Steeper learning curve, in this case it must of been a fluke to... Less customizable than Xfce, you ’ re better off using Xfce great minds thinking alike well. Have switched over to Xfce also be customised to some extent if needed need a performance-centric desktop vs... A nice balance between functionality and conservation of system resources, but Openbox has a steeper learning,...